Robes of the Constitutional Court
The Constitutional Court is not governed by the general dress matrix of the judicial order. The Royal Decree of 16 February 1984 creates a separate system in which black, royal blue, office, rank and hearing type jointly determine the correct dress.
A separate Royal Decree from 1984
The Royal Decree of 16 February 1984 governs dress for the members and clerks of the former Court of Arbitration, now the Constitutional Court. It is separate from the Royal Decree of 22 July 1970 for the ordinary judicial order. A Court of Appeal or Court of Cassation model cannot therefore be transferred to this Court automatically.
The Court’s own colour language reflects its institutional position. Four questions come before manufacture: judge or clerk, applicable rank, ordinary or solemn hearing, and entitlement to an epitoge. Measurements and practical material choices follow only after that legal and functional classification has been settled.
Ordinary dress: black with royal-blue accents
The judges’ ordinary dress is principally black, with a royal-blue belt as a defining element. The toque and prescribed finishing make office and rank differences visible. The blue belt is not an optional styling choice, nor does it mean that the complete robe is blue at every hearing.
The clerk’s ordinary dress is black too, but its functional details are not identical to a judge’s. An inventory label reading only ‘Constitutional Court — black’ is inadequate. Belt, headwear, epitoge and rank should be recorded for each garment and accessory so that a correct ensemble can be issued.
Solemn dress: royal blue becomes the main colour
At solemn hearings, royal blue becomes the robe’s principal colour. For the presidents, the rules provide gold decoration and a collar lined with white fur as a distinction of rank. The ceremonial version is therefore a separate garment with its own material and finishing logic, not merely the ordinary black robe with a different belt.
The clerk also has a royal-blue solemn version with features specific to that office. ‘Blue’ alone is not a complete product specification. Office, rank and the full combination of robe, toque, belt, cravat and any epitoge must be checked as one controlled ensemble.
The epitoge and legal qualification
For judges, the epitoge is the colour of the toque and has one row of white fur at each end. That description should be followed literally. Extra rows or a different placement cannot be introduced because a foreign judicial or academic robe happens to look similar.
A clerk wears the epitoge only when holding the doctor or licentiate in law qualification named by the rules. The office alone does not create that entitlement. Qualification belongs as a distinct verification point in the specification, without turning graduate numbers into estimates of ownership, purchasing or sales.
Twelve judges, two clerks and twenty legal secretaries
The Court’s official organisation comprises twelve judges and two clerks. The functional base directly addressed by the dress regime is therefore fourteen offices. Even that institutional figure proves neither fourteen personally owned robes, fourteen purchases nor fourteen replacements in any given year.
The Court also has twenty legal secretaries who support its legal work. The 1984 decree does not identify them as a separate robed group. Adding 12 + 2 + 20 and publishing ‘34 robe wearers’ is therefore not permissible: institutional staffing and the legal scope of official dress must remain separate.
Use the headcount to plan roles and stock
Public organisation data describe the structure of the Court, not the way its wardrobe is managed. An office-holder may require ordinary and solemn versions, while garments may also be centrally held or reused. Without an inventory, both ‘one robe per office’ and ‘two robes per office’ remain unsupported assumptions.
Replacement frequency is not fixed by the decree either. It depends on wear, fit, materials, care, storage and a change of office. A standard lifetime or annual market requirement cannot be calculated from the staffing structure; only the Court’s own garment register can support procurement planning.
From the legal model to a correct garment
Before commissioning or repair, the official model must be fixed: office, rank, hearing type, colour, belt, toque, collar, cravat and epitoge. Measurements then cover shoulder balance, sleeve length, movement at the bench, layers worn underneath and lining. Legal prescription and wearing practice complement one another but are not interchangeable.
Care must protect royal-blue components, gold decoration and white fur from fading, crushing and soil. Accessories should not be swapped without a functional label. The decree defines the dress but not a universal cleaning programme; the fibre care label and professional inspection determine safe treatment for the actual garment.
Official sources and scope
Primary sources, scope and the latest editorial review for this page.
Continue reading on Togamaker.com
Legal robes in Belgium: two decrees, several roles
Read the detailed guide.
→Togamaker.comJudicial robes in Belgium
Read the detailed guide.
→Togamaker.comThe Belgian magistrate’s robe is defined by office and occasion
Read the detailed guide.
→Togamaker.comThe Belgian court clerk’s robe: legal model and practical stock planning
Read the detailed guide.
→